Entain Cuts More Jobs as UK Taxes Hit partypoker

Entain, parent of partypoker, plans another round of layoffs as UK gambling taxes rise. Here’s what the move means for poker players.

Office worker carrying belongings out of the office amid Entain layoffs and partypoker parent company cuts

Entain’s latest layoffs show how hard UK taxes are hitting gambling

Entain, the parent company behind partypoker, Ladbrokes, and a 50% stake in BetMGM, is preparing to cut another 400 jobs. The company also said as many as 1,000 betting shops across the UK could close.

This is more than a routine restructuring story. It is a clear sign that the UK gambling market is being reshaped by tax policy, and that pressure is now spreading from balance sheets to staffing, retail footprints, and product strategy. For poker players, those changes matter because online poker often sits inside a much larger gambling ecosystem.

Why UK gambling taxes are forcing operators to shrink

In April, the UK raised the tax rate on online casino operators from 21% to 40%. Another increase is already scheduled: online sports betting tax will rise from 15% to 25% in April 2027.

According to the Betting and Gaming Council, the industry has already lost around 4,500 jobs since the tax plan was approved. That makes the current wave of layoffs part of a broader trend rather than an isolated decision by one company.

When taxes rise this sharply, operators usually respond in a few predictable ways:

That matters to poker because poker products often rely on cross-sell from casino and sportsbook traffic, especially inside large multi-product brands like poker rooms.

What Entain said and why the numbers matter

Entain had already cut 500 jobs in an earlier round, so this new plan deepens the company’s restructuring. Stella David, the CEO, warned that the tax changes could add another £100 million to Entain’s bill.

She also pointed to independent EY modeling showing the potential sector-wide damage of a 40% machine games duty rate. The estimate included:

That argument is important because it reframes the debate. The issue is no longer just whether operators can absorb higher taxes. It is whether the policy may shrink the market enough to reduce overall tax receipts and weaken local employment.

For players, this kind of pressure often shows up indirectly through tighter promotions, fewer live customer-facing staff, and less investment in communities around promotions & bonuses.

Other gambling brands are also cutting back

Entain is not alone. Evoke, the parent company of William Hill and 888poker, said it plans to close roughly 270 betting shops in the UK.

Bet365 announced layoffs of up to 300 employees at its UK headquarters, plus 40 more roles in Gibraltar and Malta. The company said the cuts were driven by “tax-related costs” and that the total reduction would be about 340 roles, or roughly 3% of its European hub workforce.

Flutter Entertainment, the parent of PokerStars, also trimmed 100 positions in July as part of a broader restructuring.

Taken together, these moves suggest a market-wide recalibration. For poker players, that may not always translate into immediate changes at the tables, but it can influence how aggressively brands invest in software, support, loyalty, and acquisition.

Expert analysis: what this means for poker players

The biggest takeaway is that online poker does not operate in a vacuum. It is usually one product inside a larger gambling group, and when that group comes under tax pressure, poker can lose budget, attention, or promotional support even if the poker client itself is still healthy.

Here’s what players should watch:

If you are comparing ecosystems, it helps to look beyond a single offer and study how a site fits into the broader market, including poker clubs and the educational path offered by a poker school.

What could happen next for Entain and the wider market

The UK remains a major gambling market with a mature regulatory framework and a national lottery. But the new tax environment makes it harder for operators to rely on broad retail networks and high-volume digital acquisition at the same time.

In the short term, expect more cost cutting, more store closures, and closer scrutiny of every product line. In the medium term, companies may push harder toward the most efficient digital channels and reduce exposure to lower-margin operations.

For players and industry followers, the lesson is simple: the strongest brands in this environment will be the ones that can adapt quickly without damaging the user experience.

If you work in the sector or are exploring opportunities, keeping an eye on the market and on roles such as a poker agent can also help you understand where the industry is moving.

Final take

Entain’s new layoffs are part of a much larger UK gambling reset. Higher taxes are forcing operators to cut jobs, close shops, and rethink how they spend.

For partypoker and the poker market more broadly, the message is clear: efficiency now matters more than expansion. Players should expect a more selective, more cost-conscious industry — and choose platforms with that reality in mind.

FAQ

Why is Entain laying off more staff at partypoker’s parent company?

Entain says the layoffs are a response to higher UK gambling taxes and rising operating costs. The pressure is affecting the wider group, not only poker.

How much did the UK tax on online casinos increase?

The tax rate on online casino operators rose from 21% to 40% in April. That jump is one of the main reasons companies are cutting costs.

Will Entain close betting shops in the UK?

Entain said around 1,000 betting shops could close as part of its restructuring. That would be a major reduction in its retail presence.

Can UK gambling tax changes affect online poker players?

Yes, indirectly. Higher taxes can lead to smaller bonuses, less marketing, fewer promotions, and less investment in poker products.

Which other companies have announced cuts?

Evoke, bet365, and Flutter Entertainment have all announced job cuts or closures in response to higher costs and tax pressure.